The following is a list of dues dates for assignments through the end of the Spring semester. Please make a note of these as they do depart from the syllabus:
4/10--In class speaker on Vietnam and The Things They Carried.(TTTC) Hwk: Revise papers.
4/15--In class Writer's Workshop and peer conferences. Hwk: Edit papers.
4/17--No class. Individual writing on papers. Papers due at 8:45 p.m. tonight! Hwk: Complete reading and RRR on TTTC.
4/22--RRR due today on TTTC. Quiz #2 on TTTC. Final in class discussion of TTTC.
4/24--In class presentation of Chinese poetry. Review of poetic devices. Poetry handout #1 distributed. Hwk: Read handout and poetry.
4/29--In class discussion of Chinese poetry. Introduction to Tang Dynasty poetry. Poetry handout #2 distributed. Groups assigned. Time for groups to meet. Hwk: Group presentation preparation.
5/1--Tang Dynasty Poetry Group Presentations. Hwk: RRR on Chinese poetry
5/6--RRR on Chinese poetry due today. Complete Tang Dynasty Poetry Group Presentations. Hwk: Final exam review
5/8--Final exam review.
5/13--Final exam
5/15--Last class
Prof. Kiefer's World Literature Spring 2014
Thursday, April 10, 2014
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Important Assignment and Due Date Changes to Syllabus
April 10--In class speaker will discuss the Vietnam War from 1968-1970 and The Things They Carried.
April 15--Writer's Workshop. Bring two hard copies of Analytic paper. Required.
April 17--Analytic Paper due to gotprofkiefer@gmail.com no later than 8:45 p.m. (original time was noon.) Please make sure to attach your paper via a Microsoft Word (the program on all computers at Kean) document, ONLY.
April 22-- Due today: 1) Quiz #2 on The Things They Carried.
2) RRR on The Things They Carried
Monday, March 31, 2014
Ivan Ilyich Analysis and Study Questions
The
Death of Ivan Ilyich by
Leo Tolstoy
A. Reading
Comprehension Chapter 1 Quiz (Part 1)
- At the beginning of the novel when
Ivan's colleagues learn of his death, why is their reaction so remarkable?
- At the funeral service, which
character tries to set up a game of bridge?
- Who is Ivan's closest friend?
- At the funeral, what is the real
reason Praskovya wants to speak to Peter privately?
- At
the funeral, Peter feels especially uneasy when he (finish the sentence)
B. Literary Analysis Chapter 1 Quiz Questions
1.
What is the point of view? Who is the
narrator? How do you know? What kind of narrator (limited, omniscient, etc.)
2.
What contrasting idea/s is/are
presented in chapter 1?
3.
Who are the five primary characters in
chapter 1? Name and describe them using
details from the text.
Chapter 2 Quiz Questions Reading Comprehension
- What type of person is Ivan attracted
to?
- Married life is pleasant for Ivan
until what event occurs?
- In his official work, Ivan tries to
maintain what tone?
Literary Analysis Chapter 2 Quiz Questions
- What metaphor does Tolstoy use to
describe Ivan’s relationship to his social superiors?
- What foreign language terms are used in
this chapter? Find out what they mean. What might the author’s purpose be
in using these terms?
- What is significant about Ivan’s
attempt/ability to close himself off from the emotional/unpleasant aspects
of his job/life by reducing everything to a mere form on a paper?
Comprehension questions for Chapters 3 and 4
- Why does Ivan take a leave of absence
from work and move with his family to the country?
- Why does Ivan receive a new
appointment with a higher paying salary?
- What event precipitates Ivan's
illness?
- What is Ivan’s greatest pleasure in life?
- What adjectives can you think of to
characterize the doctors' attitude toward Ivan? In what way is this ironic?
Analysis Questions for Chapters 3 - 4
- In view of his professional life, how
is Ivan's fall from the stepladder is especially symbolic?
- Explain
the irony between the symptoms Prakovya experiences during her pregnancy
and the experiences Ivan experiences.
- Explain how the fact that life's
unpleasantness causes the pain that Ivan experiences is a key to Ivan's
condition
- How is
the game of bridge a metaphor for Ivan’s view of life?
Comprehension Questions for Chapter 5– 8
- How does Ivan learn of the extent of
his physical degeneration?
- How does Ivan deal with unpleasant
situations or relationships?
- Who
is Gerasim? What does Gerasim do that eases Ivan's physical pain?
- What
bothers Ivan more than the physical pain?
- Who is the only person that does not
lie about the nature of Ivan's condition?
- One
night, Praskovya, Lisa, and Lisa's fiancé decide to go where? What does
Ivan think about this?
Analysis Questions for Chapters 5-8
- There is an interesting shift in the
narrative at this point. Explain this shift and explain why you think it
is important.
- What is the turning point for Ivan in
terms of coming to terms with his illness?
- In
Chapter 6, two abstract ideas are represented by the word “It”? What do you think these ideas might be?
Why do you think that the author uses the word “It” to represent them? How
does this shift affect the reader?
- Gerasim
is most likely an allegorical character, which means he stands for
abstract ideas. What ideas do you think he might stand for? Explain.
Comprehension Questions 09 – 12
- Ivan dreams of what object?
- When Ivan awakes from his dream, what
does he hear?
- When Ivan thinks back on his life,
what does he think is the best part?
- When Ivan passes into the bright
light, what does he compare the experience to?
- When Ivan catches sight of the light,
he realizes that his life has not been a good one. What else happens
simultaneously?
Analysis Questions for Chapter 9 – 12
- What
does the black bag symbolize? What does Ivan’s struggle with the black bag
represent? What does it mean when he breaks through the black bag?
- Ivan
seems to have an “existential” moment when he cries out “Why has thou done
all this?” This could be an allusion. If so, to what is the
reference? Why is this an
“existential” moment? (You will
have to look up the word “existentialism” in order to understand.)
- Explain
how time and space change from the beginning of the novel to the end of
the novel. What does this symbolize?
- In
your opinion, why does Ivan’s belief that his life has been a good one
prevent him from getting into the black bag?
- What
is your interpretation of the railway car analogy?
- Did
Ivan Ilyich live a proper life? Does Ivan Ilyich ever learn what it means
to live a proper life? What is, in your opinion, Tolstoy’s message or
theme?
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Analytic Paper Assignment
World Literature
2403/26
Professor Kiefer
Spring 2014
Analytical Paper:
For this course you will be required to write
one 5-7 page paper outside of class, of a minimum 1500 words in length. Minimum
paper lengths are so extremely short that anyone desiring a high grade would be
advised to write a somewhat longer one. Any paper shorter than the minimum
assigned will receive an F as an incomplete assignment. Except for meeting the
very low minimum number of pages, don't concentrate on length, but try to make
your papers as detailed, well-organized, and interesting as possible. All
papers must be completed on a format that can be opened on the computers at
Kean. Microsoft Word is ideal since
I will be grading, commenting and returning them to you electronically. These
papers are not necessarily research papers, and it is possible to receive an A
on a paper without doing research for them, although good papers, incorporating
good library work, will normally receive higher grades.
You
should choose a topic you are particularly interested in, not try to guess what
I want you to write. When I can learn something new from a paper, I am pleased.
By Tuesday, April 1, you will
send me a proposal briefly describing the thesis of your paper. If
necessary I will give you advice on how to proceed. I am happy to answer
questions about proposed topics. Papers are to be submitted to gotprofkiefer@gmail.com by noon on Thursday April 17,
Papers may always be handed in before the due date if you wish.
Prompt:
Create a 5-7
page (1500-1800 words) term paper comparing and/or contrasting a common thematic
element(s) in two of the pieces of literature we have read thus far: Antigone, The Odyssey, Macbeth, The Stranger
and The Death of Ivan Ilyich. This essay requires a close reading and
analysis of the texts. You may create your own topic or consider one of the
following: loyalty, fidelity, vision vs. blindness, the use of disguise, pride
and stubbornness, what it means to be a hero, etc. You
are relatively free to choose your topic, as long as it analyzes thematic
elements common in both pieces you
choose. This essay should not be a summary of the material, but a critical analysis
of the material. Be original, but be
sure that your claims are supported by evidence from the texts.
Assessment:
The
following elements are taken into consideration when I grade your papers:
1)
You must convince me that you have closely read and understood the texts.
2)
You must have sent me your thesis to review by noon on Tuesday April 1.
3)
You must respond to the prompt as given.
4)
You must follow the Kean University Composition guidelines (attached on rubric)
5) I
expect you to support your arguments with references to the text, often
including quotations appropriately introduced and analyzed (but quote only to
make points about the material quoted, not simply for its own sake).
6)
Your paper must be sent electronically in the format described above to Gotprofkiefer@gmail.com by noon on Thursday April 17.
Late
Papers:
If
you think you have a valid excuse (medical, etc.) for not getting a paper in on
time, let me know in advance via e-mail at gotprofkiefer@gmail.com. Papers
handed in late with no excuse will not receive a passing grade. To pass the
course you must hand in this paper.
Analytic Paper Rubric
World Literature 2403/26-- Spring 2014
Professor Kiefer
Rubric Analytic Paper
Prompt: Create a five to seven page (1600-1800 words) term paper comparing and/or contrasting a common theme in a piece of literature we have read thus far. This essay requires a close reading and analysis of the texts. This essay should not be a summary of the material, but a critical analysis of the material. Be original, but be sure that your claims are supported by evidence from the texts.
Professor Kiefer
Rubric Analytic Paper
Prompt: Create a five to seven page (1600-1800 words) term paper comparing and/or contrasting a common theme in a piece of literature we have read thus far. This essay requires a close reading and analysis of the texts. This essay should not be a summary of the material, but a critical analysis of the material. Be original, but be sure that your claims are supported by evidence from the texts.
Assessment: ______points out of 30. Final letter grade: _______
On a scale of 1-5
__________1) The writing indicates a close reading and understanding of the texts.
__________2) An effective thesis statement was submitted by Tuesday, April 1.
__________3) The writing responds to the prompt as given.
__________4) The writing followed the Kean University Composition Guidelines (attached)
__________5) The writing is thematically-based and is supported by arguments with references to the text, including quotations appropriately introduced and analyzed.
__________6) The writing was sent
electronically in the format described above to Gotprofkiefer@gmail.com by noon
on Thursday April 17. Or an extension was requested with a valid reason, well
in advance of the deadline.
Composition skills to be corrected are underlined and bolded below
Composition skills to be corrected are underlined and bolded below
Kean University English Composition Grading Policies
Writing assignments are evaluated according to
a) clarity of purpose;
b) appropriateness to audience;
c) clarity of focus;
d) quality of development;
e) effectiveness of organization;
f) degree of fluency;
g) stylistic skill demonstrated through word choice (diction) and sentence structure (syntax); and
h) correctness of mechanics (grammar, spelling, punctuation).
A Excellent fulfillment of the assignments requirements; original substantive content; effective organization and logical development; correct mechanics; clear effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable).
B Above average fulfillment of the assignments requirements; thorough and interesting content; good organization; correct mechanics; effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable)
C Fulfills basic requirements of the assignment; some solid content; adequate organization; no major mechanical errors; no major documentation errors.
D Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; vague content; ineffective organization; major mechanical errors; significant errors in documentation.
F Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; little content; minimal form; major, serious repeated mechanical errors; violations of the Academic Integrity Policy.
Writing assignments are evaluated according to
a) clarity of purpose;
b) appropriateness to audience;
c) clarity of focus;
d) quality of development;
e) effectiveness of organization;
f) degree of fluency;
g) stylistic skill demonstrated through word choice (diction) and sentence structure (syntax); and
h) correctness of mechanics (grammar, spelling, punctuation).
A Excellent fulfillment of the assignments requirements; original substantive content; effective organization and logical development; correct mechanics; clear effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable).
B Above average fulfillment of the assignments requirements; thorough and interesting content; good organization; correct mechanics; effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable)
C Fulfills basic requirements of the assignment; some solid content; adequate organization; no major mechanical errors; no major documentation errors.
D Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; vague content; ineffective organization; major mechanical errors; significant errors in documentation.
F Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; little content; minimal form; major, serious repeated mechanical errors; violations of the Academic Integrity Policy.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Reminders: Sunday at 3 pm and Tuesday, 3/4 during class
Homework:
1) Please send me your leitmotif quotes with the motif in the subject line (and your name) by Sunday at 3 pm. Send these to my gotprofkiefer@gmail.com email.
2) Macbeth RRR is due Tuesday during class.
Midterm will be Thursday, March 6 and will take the entire class. Notes are welcome and encouraged! Print-outs are not.
1) Please send me your leitmotif quotes with the motif in the subject line (and your name) by Sunday at 3 pm. Send these to my gotprofkiefer@gmail.com email.
2) Macbeth RRR is due Tuesday during class.
Midterm will be Thursday, March 6 and will take the entire class. Notes are welcome and encouraged! Print-outs are not.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)