World Literature 2403/26-- Spring 2014
Professor Kiefer
Rubric Analytic Paper
Prompt: Create a five to seven page (1600-1800 words) term paper comparing and/or contrasting a common theme in a piece of literature we have read thus far. This essay requires a close reading and analysis of the texts. This essay should not be a summary of the material, but a critical analysis of the material. Be original, but be sure that your claims are supported by evidence from the texts.
Professor Kiefer
Rubric Analytic Paper
Prompt: Create a five to seven page (1600-1800 words) term paper comparing and/or contrasting a common theme in a piece of literature we have read thus far. This essay requires a close reading and analysis of the texts. This essay should not be a summary of the material, but a critical analysis of the material. Be original, but be sure that your claims are supported by evidence from the texts.
Assessment: ______points out of 30. Final letter grade: _______
On a scale of 1-5
__________1) The writing indicates a close reading and understanding of the texts.
__________2) An effective thesis statement was submitted by Tuesday, April 1.
__________3) The writing responds to the prompt as given.
__________4) The writing followed the Kean University Composition Guidelines (attached)
__________5) The writing is thematically-based and is supported by arguments with references to the text, including quotations appropriately introduced and analyzed.
__________6) The writing was sent
electronically in the format described above to Gotprofkiefer@gmail.com by noon
on Thursday April 17. Or an extension was requested with a valid reason, well
in advance of the deadline.
Composition skills to be corrected are underlined and bolded below
Composition skills to be corrected are underlined and bolded below
Kean University English Composition Grading Policies
Writing assignments are evaluated according to
a) clarity of purpose;
b) appropriateness to audience;
c) clarity of focus;
d) quality of development;
e) effectiveness of organization;
f) degree of fluency;
g) stylistic skill demonstrated through word choice (diction) and sentence structure (syntax); and
h) correctness of mechanics (grammar, spelling, punctuation).
A Excellent fulfillment of the assignments requirements; original substantive content; effective organization and logical development; correct mechanics; clear effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable).
B Above average fulfillment of the assignments requirements; thorough and interesting content; good organization; correct mechanics; effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable)
C Fulfills basic requirements of the assignment; some solid content; adequate organization; no major mechanical errors; no major documentation errors.
D Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; vague content; ineffective organization; major mechanical errors; significant errors in documentation.
F Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; little content; minimal form; major, serious repeated mechanical errors; violations of the Academic Integrity Policy.
Writing assignments are evaluated according to
a) clarity of purpose;
b) appropriateness to audience;
c) clarity of focus;
d) quality of development;
e) effectiveness of organization;
f) degree of fluency;
g) stylistic skill demonstrated through word choice (diction) and sentence structure (syntax); and
h) correctness of mechanics (grammar, spelling, punctuation).
A Excellent fulfillment of the assignments requirements; original substantive content; effective organization and logical development; correct mechanics; clear effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable).
B Above average fulfillment of the assignments requirements; thorough and interesting content; good organization; correct mechanics; effective diction and syntax; fluent use of language; correct documentation (when applicable)
C Fulfills basic requirements of the assignment; some solid content; adequate organization; no major mechanical errors; no major documentation errors.
D Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; vague content; ineffective organization; major mechanical errors; significant errors in documentation.
F Does not fulfill basic requirements of the assignment; little content; minimal form; major, serious repeated mechanical errors; violations of the Academic Integrity Policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment